Perched on the wind-plain edge of northeastern Montana, the Fort Peck Theatre reads like a page torn from a fairytale about work, community, and the strange persistence of places. Built in 1934 as part of the human whirlwind that was the Fort Peck Dam project, the theatre began life not as an enduring monument but as an insistently cheerful amenity — a place to gather, to darken the day with celluloid light, to drink coffee in the lobby and trade news about steel and scaffolds. Yet the building refused the ephemerality intended for it. Over nine decades it has accreted story upon story: of the workers who filled its benches during the dam’s fevered years, of the preservationists who saved a beloved community anchor, and of the whispers — theatrical and spectral — that cling to backstage corridors. ([fpst][1])
The tale begins in the thicket of the 1930s, when Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal transformed both landscape and labor across the American West. Fort Peck itself was a planned town born of federal necessity: the Corps of Engineers, an army of skilled men and craftsmen, converged to build one of the era’s great public works. The theatre was constructed as an amenity for the project’s workforce — a movie house open day and night to entertain the thousands who lived in temporary quarters surrounding the dam. Its architecture is an almost whimsical Swiss-chalet pastiche: steep gables, exposed trusses, and carefully crafted wooden fixtures that betray both the aesthetic ambitions and the practical craftsmanship of its builders. The National Park Service’s nomination for the National Register of Historic Places notes the structure’s unusual combination of temporary origins and permanent craftsmanship, comparing its timber-work aesthetics to better-known mountain lodges of the period. ([npgallery.nps.gov][2])
The building’s interior — a 1,200-seat auditorium with broad wooden beams and hand-forged fixtures — is a kind of evidence of New Deal optimism: even a “temporary” structure was made with an eye for detail. The Corps’ workshops fabricated lighting and ornamentation; the stage and auditorium were built to take on workaday movies and occasional live events alike. Those choices would allow the theatre to outlive its ephemeral purpose and, in time, to become a locus of local identity. ([npgallery.nps.gov][2])
After the dam’s completion and the ebb of the construction camps, Fort Peck settled into a quieter rhythm. The theatre, initially meant for the rolling population of dam workers, persisted as a civic resource. In the 1970s it was repurposed to host live theatre; since then it has operated as the Fort Peck Summer Theatre (FPST), bringing touring acts, community performances, and an annual season of plays to the region. Local stewardship — by volunteers, local arts councils, and the Fort Peck Fine Arts Council — has kept the building in active use and ensured that its story remained one of local pride rather than decay. Contemporary descriptions of the theatre’s program emphasize not only its entertainment role but its function as a cultural anchor for rural Montana communities that might otherwise lose such institutions to time and migration. ([fpst][3])
Preservation work in recent decades — including grant-supported projects to maintain original lighting and structural elements — reflects a layered understanding of the site: part machine of memory, part functioning performance space. The Fort Peck Fine Arts Council’s historic lighting preservation project, for example, ties the practical needs of a working theatre to the wider heritage work of conserving New Deal craftsmanship in situ. ([The Foundation for Montana History][4])
Places like the Fort Peck Theatre are palimpsests: human lives are written upon their surfaces and then overwritten, but the earlier texts do not entirely vanish. Fort Peck’s life was not without sorrow. The construction of the dam was a Great Depression-era industry, and with such projects often came injury and sometimes death. The region’s history — and the intimate memories of families who lived in Fort Peck City during the 1930s — imbue local stories with the kind of melancholic gravitas that invites legend. The New Yorker’s personal reflections on Fort Peck’s engineering years underscore the high stakes and human cost of the dam’s construction; these are the kinds of background realities that seed later tales of haunting, whether as actual supernatural claims or as metaphors for communal memory. ([The New Yorker][5])
Theatre buildings everywhere tend to accumulate legends: the creak of a floorboard, the cold spot near a prop room, the uncanny sense that you are not alone after the last light goes out. The Fort Peck Theatre, with its long wooden trusses and backstage warrens, has proven fertile ground for such stories. Anecdotal accounts from staff and performers describe hearing the sound of work — footsteps, the murmur of men moving set pieces — on nights when the theatre should be empty. Dressing rooms have supplied tales of apparitions or fleeting presences. These accounts, while anecdotal, are consistent with a wider theatrical folklore that treats theatres as alive with their own memory: the energy of performances, rehearsals, and the labor that sustains them. ([The Glasgow Courier][6])
One of the theatre’s most persistent specters has a name: Floyd. Local reporting and interviews with FPST personnel have popularized this figure as the theatre’s resident apparition. According to long-time staff and the theatre’s artistic directors, Floyd is often described as wearing 1930s work clothes, the spectral echo of a dam-worker or Corps craftsperson whose presence lingers in the building he once helped to build or entertain. Rather than horror’s malign force, Floyd is typically represented as a benign, even helpful presence — a theatrical poltergeist who prefers to make his presence known through small noises and the odd moved prop, rather than outright fright. Such characterizations echo a common pattern in American hauntings: spirits of labor and caretaking, rather than malevolent revenants. ([The Glasgow Courier][6])
Journalistic pieces and local features—like the Glasgow Courier’s profile of the theatre’s “friendly ghost”—allow us to see how a community narrates its own past. The Floyd stories are less about proving the paranormal than about creating a shared identity: cast and crew tell the same tales, newcomers learn the ritual of nodding to the ghost before a first rehearsal, and audiences delight in the theatre’s warm patina of legend. In short, the haunt is as much a social performance as the plays staged on the marquee nights. ([The Glasgow Courier][6])
From a historian’s standpoint, the “haunting” of Fort Peck Theatre can be productively read at multiple registers. First, material history supplies the conditions for the stories: a dramatic, well-crafted building built during a tense, large-scale construction effort; an interior of creaking beams and dim corridors; the human trauma and camaraderie of the dam years. Second, oral history and local journalism record the stories themselves — the Floyd anecdotes, the backstage noise reports, the dressing-room apparitions — and preserve them as part of Fort Peck’s communal culture. Third, folkloric logic shapes interpretation: theatres by their nature invite story and superstition. Where bright light meets darkened house, where an audience shares breath and silence, imagination is quick to animate the building. ([npgallery.nps.gov][2])
The empirical task of proving a ghost remains elusive and, for most cultural historians, beside the point. What matters as much — perhaps more — is what the stories do. The hauntings of Fort Peck Theatre help bind generations together; they offer a narrative through which the community acknowledges labor, remembers hardship, and celebrates resilience. They also serve a practical cultural function: such legends attract visitors, enliven interpretive programming, and reinforce the theatre’s identity as a living monument rather than a static museum piece. ([Missouri River MT][7])
To sit in Fort Peck’s auditorium is to be held inside a lattice of time. The building’s beams carry the memory of thousands of evenings: silent film reels flickering, live actors taking their bows, the hush of an audience. The stories of Floyd and other odd happenings are not distractions from the theatre’s history; they are threaded through it, part of the human habit of making myth from memory. Whether one believes in ghosts or not, the Fort Peck Theatre stands as a singular testimony — to New Deal craftsmanship, to small-town cultural vitality, and to the way communities keep their past alive through story. In the soft glow of its marquee one senses something like continuity: a structure built as temporary that insisted, instead, on becoming permanent. And in that insistence we find the truer haunt: not a single spectral figure, but the abiding presence of lives once lived, remembered, and retold. ([npgallery.nps.gov][2])
* Fort Peck Summer Theatre, “Theatre History,” Fort Peck Summer Theatre, accessed November 16, 2025, [https://www.fortpecktheatre.org/theatre-history](https://www.fortpecktheatre.org/theatre-history). ([fpst][1])
* Jack W. Nickels Jr. and Mary Moore, *National Register of Historic Places Inventory/Nomination: Fort Peck Theatre / Fort Peck Summer Theatre* (National Park Service, June 26, 1982), NPS digital asset, [https://npgallery.nps.gov/GetAsset/f201b4f6-194e-4a2c-a0a2-49bede29cf0c/](https://npgallery.nps.gov/GetAsset/f201b4f6-194e-4a2c-a0a2-49bede29cf0c/). ([npgallery.nps.gov][2])
* Andy Young, “Floyd the Friendly Ghost of the Fort Peck Summer Theatre,” *Glasgow Courier*, October 31, 2018, [https://www.glasgowcourier.com/story/2018/10/31/lifestyle/floyd-the-friendly-ghost-of-the-fort-peck-summer-theatre/6852.html](https://www.glasgowcourier.com/story/2018/10/31/lifestyle/floyd-the-friendly-ghost-of-the-fort-peck-summer-theatre/6852.html). ([The Glasgow Courier][6])
* “Fort Peck Theatre,” *Wikipedia*, last modified 2024, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Peck_Theatre](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Peck_Theatre). ([Wikipedia][8])
* “It is said that the Fort Peck Theatre is haunted…,” *HauntedRooms.com*, n.d., [https://www.hauntedrooms.com/montana/haunted-places](https://www.hauntedrooms.com/montana/haunted-places). ([Haunted Rooms America][9])
* “Fort Peck Summer Theatre,” *Visit Montana*, n.d., [https://visitmt.com/listing/fort-peck-summer-theatre](https://visitmt.com/listing/fort-peck-summer-theatre).
* Fort Peck Fine Arts Council, “Historic Lighting Preservation,” *Montana Historical Society / Grant Recipients*, January 13, 2025, [https://www.mthistory.org/grant-recipients/fort-peck-fine-arts-council-historic-lighting-preservation](https://www.mthistory.org/grant-recipients/fort-peck-fine-arts-council-historic-lighting-preservation). ([The Foundation for Montana History][4])
---
[1]: https://www.fortpecktheatre.org/theatre-history?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Theatre History | fpst"
[2]: https://npgallery.nps.gov/GetAsset/f201b4f6-194e-4a2c-a0a2-49bede29cf0c/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "1. Name 2. Location 6. Representation in Existing Surveys"
[3]: https://www.fortpecktheatre.org/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Fort Peck Theatre"
[4]: https://www.mthistory.org/grant-recipients/fort-peck-fine-arts-council-historic-lighting-preservation?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Fort Peck Fine Arts Council – Historic Lighting Preservation"
[5]: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1989/03/27/impalpable-dust?utm_source=chatgpt.com "IMPALPABLE DUST"
[6]: https://www.glasgowcourier.com/story/2018/10/31/lifestyle/floyd-the-friendly-ghost-of-the-fort-peck-summer-theatre/6852.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Floyd the Friendly Ghost of the Fort Peck Summer Theatre"
[7]: https://missouririvermt.com/listing/8787?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Fort Peck Theatre"
[8]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Peck_Theatre?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Fort Peck Theatre"
[9]: https://www.hauntedrooms.com/montana/haunted-places?utm_source=chatgpt.com "The Most Haunted Places in Montana"