The Historical Significance of Fort Belknap Indian Reservation in Montana History

The Fort Belknap Indian Reservation stands as a testament to the resilience and endurance of the Aaniiih (Gros Ventre) and Nakoda (Assiniboine) peoples in north-central Montana. Encompassing approximately 675,147 acres of rolling plains bordered by the Milk River to the north and the Little Rocky Mountains to the south, the reservation represents both a dramatic reduction of ancestral territories and a determined effort to preserve tribal sovereignty and cultural identity. The historical trajectory of Fort Belknap reveals essential themes in American Indian history: treaty negotiations and territorial dispossession, legal precedents that shaped federal Indian law, environmental exploitation and indigenous resistance, and contemporary efforts toward cultural and ecological restoration. Understanding Fort Belknap's history illuminates broader patterns of indigenous-settler relations in the American West while highlighting the specific experiences of two distinct tribal nations who forged a shared political community under extraordinary circumstances.

The Aaniiih and Nakoda peoples arrived in present-day Montana through separate migration routes from eastern territories. The Gros Ventre, linguistically affiliated with the Arapaho, originally occupied lands in southern Saskatchewan and along the Saskatchewan River before migrating westward with the Arapaho and Cheyenne. Following their arrival in Montana, the Arapaho and Cheyenne continued southward, while the Gros Ventre established alliances with the Blackfeet Confederacy ("Fort Belknap Reservation Timeline"). The Assiniboine, whose name derives from an Ojibwe word meaning "one who cooks with stones," split from the Yanktonai Sioux in the seventeenth century and migrated westward onto the northern plains alongside their allies, the Plains Cree. By the early nineteenth century, both tribes had established themselves as formidable buffalo hunters and warriors in the region that would become north-central Montana (United States. Office of Indian Affairs).

The establishment of formal U.S.-tribal relations began with the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1851, which included the Assiniboine and Gros Ventre along with the Cheyenne, Arapaho, various Sioux bands, Crow, Shoshone, Mandans, Arikaras, and other tribes. This gathering of approximately 10,000 Indigenous people represented one of the largest treaty councils in American history. Article 5 of the treaty formally described the territories claimed by the Gros Ventre and Assiniboine, providing federal recognition of their territorial rights ("Fort Belknap Reservation Timeline"). Four years later, the 1855 Judith River Treaty, also known as the Lame Bull Treaty, further defined common hunting grounds and established that the Assiniboine held hunting privileges in areas shared with the Blackfeet. The Gros Ventre signed this treaty as members of the Blackfeet nation, cementing their political alliance with that confederacy ("Welcome to Fort Belknap Indian Community").

The federal government's engagement with the tribes intensified as Euro-American settlement expanded westward. In 1867, Fort Belknap was established on the south side of the Milk River as both a military fort and trading post. Named after William W. Belknap, who served as Secretary of War during the Grant administration, the fort became the agency for distributing annuities and rations to the Gros Ventre and Assiniboine Indians in the region ("Fort Belknap Reservation Timeline"). The fort's establishment represented the federal government's attempt to concentrate previously nomadic peoples into defined areas, facilitating the transformation of indigenous economies from buffalo-based subsistence to sedentary agriculture—a cornerstone of federal assimilation policy.

President Ulysses S. Grant issued a series of executive orders in 1873 and 1874 that dramatically affected tribal territories in Montana. The 1873 Executive Order established an undivided territory for the Blackfeet, Gros Ventre, Assiniboine, and Sioux spanning lands north of the Missouri and Sun Rivers. The subsequent 1874 Executive Order moved the southern boundary northward from the Sun River to the Marias River, significantly reducing the territory available to these tribes. President Grant issued another Executive Order in 1875 restoring some diminished lands, but President Rutherford B. Hayes rescinded this restoration in 1880, removing territory around the Musselshell and Missouri Rivers ("Fort Belknap Reservation Timeline"). These administrative actions demonstrated the precarious nature of tribal land tenure, subject to the unilateral decisions of federal executives without meaningful tribal consultation or consent.

The formal establishment of the Fort Belknap Reservation occurred through the Sweetgrass Hills Agreement of 1888, ratified by Congress on May 1 of that year. This agreement resulted from intense pressure on the tribes to cede vast territories to accommodate Euro-American settlement and facilitate the construction of the Great Northern Railroad, which crossed reservation lands that same year. Under the 1888 agreement, the tribes ceded approximately 17,500,000 acres to the United States in exchange for the creation of three separate reservations in Montana: the Blackfeet Reservation along the Canadian border, the Fort Peck Reservation for the Sioux and eastern Assiniboine bands, and the Fort Belknap Reservation for the Gros Ventre and those Assiniboine who had remained in the Milk River region ("THE FORT BELKNAP RESERVATION HOME TO THE GROS VENTRE AND ASSINIBOINE"). The Fort Belknap Agency was established at its present location, approximately four miles southeast of what would become the town of Harlem, Montana ("Welcome to Fort Belknap Indian Community").

The territorial reductions imposed by the 1888 agreement marked the beginning of a new chapter in Fort Belknap's history characterized by further dispossession and external exploitation. In 1884, gold had been discovered in the Little Rocky Mountains on the southern portion of the reservation. Despite the mountains' location within reservation boundaries and their profound spiritual significance to the tribes—particularly the Gros Ventre, who used the peaks for vision quests and ceremonies—miners illegally staked claims on Indian land ("Fort Belknap Reservation Timeline"). The federal government's response to this trespass revealed the priorities of Indian policy in the late nineteenth century: rather than protecting tribal resources as treaty obligations required, authorities sought to legitimize the miners' presence through a forced land cession.

In 1895, the federal government dispatched a commission led by George Bird Grinnell to negotiate the purchase of the gold-rich Little Rockies from the Fort Belknap tribes. The negotiations occurred under duress. Commission members explicitly threatened tribal leaders that if they refused to sign the agreement, the tribes would not receive their winter rations—a coercive tactic that exploited the tribes' dependence on government-supplied provisions following the destruction of the buffalo herds. Facing the prospect of starvation, tribal leaders signed an agreement selling approximately 49 square miles of the Little Rocky Mountains, encompassing an area seven miles by seven miles, for $360,000. The agreement was ratified by Congress in 1896 ("History of Mining and Protection in the Little Rocky Mountains"). Only 37 Gros Ventre members consented to the 1896 cession, demonstrating the minimal tribal support for relinquishing these sacred lands ("Fort Belknap Indian Community responds to Luke Ployhar's plans"). Within months of congressional ratification, prospectors flooded the Little Rockies, rapidly establishing the mining districts of Zortman and Landusky ("History of Mining and Protection in the Little Rocky Mountains").

The loss of the Little Rockies inflicted lasting cultural and spiritual wounds. The mountains contained sacred sites where tribal members conducted fasting ceremonies and engaged in spiritual communion for generations. The Gros Ventre particularly regarded peaks such as Eagle Child and Mission Peak as places of profound religious significance. Beyond their spiritual importance, the Little Rockies contained the headwaters of the tribes' water sources in the southern portion of the reservation. The mining operations that followed the 1896 cession would have devastating environmental consequences that affected the reservation for more than a century ("1 Gros Ventre and Assiniboine Tribes").

While the tribes struggled with territorial losses and resource exploitation, they simultaneously confronted threats to their water rights. The 1888 agreement establishing the Fort Belknap Reservation made no explicit mention of water rights related to the Milk River, which formed the reservation's northern boundary. As Euro-American settlers moved into the region in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, they constructed dams and reservoirs that diverted water from the Milk River, dramatically reducing the flow available to the reservation. The settlers invoked the doctrine of prior appropriation, claiming they had established beneficial use of the water before the tribes, despite the tribes' millennia of habitation in the region ("Winters v. United States").

In 1905, the United States government filed suit against the settlers on behalf of the Fort Belknap tribes, arguing that the diversions left insufficient water for agricultural development on the reservation. The case eventually reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which issued its decision on January 6, 1908. In Winters v. United States, the Court ruled that the establishment of the Fort Belknap Reservation necessarily implied the reservation of sufficient water from the Milk River to fulfill the purposes for which the reservation was created. The Court reasoned that the federal government intended the reservation to serve as a permanent homeland where the tribes could become self-sufficient through agriculture. Since the arid lands would be practically valueless without irrigation, the agreement implicitly reserved water rights with a priority date corresponding to the reservation's establishment in 1888, superior to the claims of later-arriving settlers ("Winters v. United States"). This landmark decision, known as the Winters Doctrine, established the legal foundation for reserved water rights for all federally recognized tribes across the United States, making Fort Belknap the birthplace of federal Indian reserved water rights ("WINTERS DOCTRINE").

The early twentieth century brought additional federal interventions that reshaped reservation life. During the construction of the Milk River Project, tons of rock were hauled from Fort Belknap's Snake Butte to the dam site. The tribes initially faced payment of only five cents per ton for this material but successfully negotiated an increase to twenty-five cents per ton—a modest victory that demonstrated tribal agency even within constrained circumstances ("Fort Belknap Reservation Timeline"). During World War I and World War II, Fort Belknap tribal members served in the U.S. military alongside approximately 25,000 American Indians nationwide, contributing to the defense of a nation that had systematically dispossessed their peoples ("Fort Belknap Reservation Timeline").

The Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) of 1934 represented a significant shift in federal Indian policy, moving away from the allotment system that had fragmented tribal lands toward recognition of tribal self-governance. Fort Belknap tribal members participated in regional Indian Congress meetings in Rapid City, South Dakota, in 1934 to discuss the proposed legislation. On October 27, 1934, tribal members voted to accept the IRA ("Welcome to Fort Belknap Indian Community"). On October 19, 1935, the tribes adopted a constitution and bylaws, which received approval from Secretary of the Interior Harold L. Ickes on December 13, 1935. The constitution established the Fort Belknap Community Council as the governing body with authority to negotiate with federal, state, and local governments; manage tribal lands; and protect the health, security, and general welfare of the community ("corporate charter of the fort belknap indian community"). On August 25, 1937, the tribes ratified a corporate charter, completing the reorganization process and establishing the Fort Belknap Indian Community as a unified political entity ("Fort Belknap Reservation Timeline").

The adoption of the IRA constitution represented both opportunity and challenge for Fort Belknap. The new governmental structure, based on American-style representative democracy with elected officers and council members, departed significantly from traditional decision-making processes. The constitution called for election of council members from districts that had been drawn during the allotment era when federal policy aimed to transform Indians into farmers. These arbitrary geographical divisions cut across traditional kinship and cultural groupings. Nevertheless, the constitution provided a framework for the two tribes—the Aaniiih and Nakoda—to govern themselves as a unified community while maintaining their distinct cultural identities. The original governmental structure evolved over subsequent decades. In 1974, the tribal constitution was amended to elect a council of twelve representatives—six Gros Ventre and six Assiniboine—ensuring equal representation for both tribes. A further amendment in 1994 restructured the council to four representatives from three districts, with the chair and vice-chair running as a team that must include one member from each tribe ("Assiniboine and Gros Ventre Tribes and Fort Belknap Reservation Timeline").

The reservation faced renewed environmental threats in the late twentieth century when modern mining returned to the Little Rockies. In 1977, the Zortman and Landusky mines began operations on the land the tribes had been coerced into selling in 1895. Unlike the underground mining operations of the early twentieth century, the new mines employed cyanide heap-leach processing, which involved excavating enormous quantities of rock and spraying it with cyanide solution to extract gold. The Montana Department of State Lands approved operating permits for Zortman Mining, Inc., a subsidiary of Pegasus Gold Corporation, in June 1979. The mines represented one of the first applications of cyanide heap-leach technology in Montana and among the earliest in the nation—a dubious distinction that Pegasus Gold marketed as an innovation despite the poorly understood environmental risks ("Home | Red Thunder Oral History Project").

The environmental consequences proved catastrophic. Within three years of operations commencing, pollution began leaking from the mine sites. By June 1990, following at least three spills in the previous year, the Fort Belknap Community Council Tribal Health Department issued warnings to reservation residents that water from streams originating in the Little Rockies might not be safe for consumption. The mines leaked acids, cyanide, arsenic, and lead from multiple drainage sites, contaminating water sources that flowed toward the reservation ("History of Mining and Protection in the Little Rocky Mountains"). The Environmental Protection Agency filed a complaint against Pegasus Gold Corporation and Zortman Mining, Inc. in June 1995 for violations of the federal Clean Water Act, seeking civil penalties and injunctive relief. Montana filed a supplemental complaint soon afterward, and the Fort Belknap Community Council, Assiniboine Tribe, and Gros Ventre Tribe filed their own complaint in federal district court alleging violations of environmental legislation ("History of Mining and Protection in the Little Rocky Mountains").

The legal battle culminated in a Consent Decree signed in July 1996 between Pegasus, the EPA, the Montana Department of Environmental Quality, and the tribes. The decree outlined $37 million in civil penalties and established monitoring, mitigation, and reclamation procedures. Notably, the settlement allowed Pegasus to continue mining operations under allegedly safer conditions rather than requiring complete cessation. However, when Pegasus sought to expand the mines in 1996, the tribes, along with Island Mountain Protectors and the National Wildlife Federation, appealed. In an unusual move, the federal Interior Board of Land Appeals halted the expansion in June 1997 pending investigation of the appeal. The prolonged legal challenges, combined with economic factors, eventually led to Pegasus Gold's bankruptcy. Mining operations ceased in 1998, leaving behind a landscape scarred by open pits and requiring extensive environmental remediation that continues into the twenty-first century ("A company that moved mountains runs into a wall").

Parallel to these struggles over land and water, Fort Belknap pursued educational and cultural initiatives that strengthened tribal capacity and identity. In 1984, Fort Belknap College received its charter, providing higher education opportunities on the reservation. The institution was later renamed Aaniiih Nakoda College, explicitly honoring both tribes in its identity. The college has played a crucial role in cultural preservation and educational advancement, offering two-year associate degrees in arts and sciences along with certificate programs. The tribal archives are housed on campus, preserving historical documents and cultural materials for future generations. In recent years, the college has expanded its mission to include ecological education and research. Through the Aaniiih Nakoda Ecology program and the Tataa (Buffalo) Research and Education Center, the college cultivates the next generation of tribal leaders, providing students with knowledge and skills related to bison and prairie wildlife species, grassland ecosystems, and ecological monitoring ("Bringing Bison Home | Initiatives | WWF"). This integration of traditional knowledge with contemporary scientific methods exemplifies the innovative approaches Fort Belknap has adopted to address twenty-first-century challenges while maintaining cultural continuity.

The buffalo restoration program represents one of Fort Belknap's most significant cultural and ecological initiatives. The extermination of bison in the late nineteenth century devastated Plains Indian societies, eliminating not merely a food source but a relative central to spiritual practices, material culture, and social organization. The last wild buffalo herd in the continental United States existed in the lush Milk River valley between the Bear Paw Mountains and the Little Rocky Mountains before its destruction ("Welcome to Fort Belknap Indian Community"). Fort Belknap began restoring buffalo to reservation lands in the 1970s, making it one of the earliest tribal buffalo restoration programs. In 1977, the Assiniboine Treaty Committee transferred ownership of 31 buffalo to the Fort Belknap Tribal Council, marking the first reintroduction. The herd, named after Snake Butte at the northern portion of the reservation, grew to 280 animals by 1996 and began supporting an annual hunting program ("Tribal Buffalo Conservation Summit").

Fort Belknap's buffalo program expanded significantly in 2013 when 34 Yellowstone bison were transferred from the Fort Peck Indian Reservation to Fort Belknap, establishing a conservation herd of genetically pure wild bison. This transfer resulted from an agreement brokered by Defenders of Wildlife with Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, representing the second successful relocation of Yellowstone buffalo to tribal lands on the Northern Plains. Today, Fort Belknap manages two distinct buffalo herds serving different purposes: a business herd that generates revenue through non-tribal hunts and meat sales, and a cultural herd that provides for tribal member hunts, community sustenance, and educational programming. The buffalo currently roam on approximately 23,000 acres, with ongoing expansion projects that will eventually increase the pasture area to approximately 35,000 acres. This expansion includes re-seeding 4,500 acres of former cropland back to native grasses and forbs, providing habitat not only for bison but also for songbirds, pollinators, and numerous other species ("Bringing Bison Home | Initiatives | WWF").

The buffalo restoration efforts contribute to multiple dimensions of tribal wellbeing. Ecologically, bison serve as keystone species whose grazing, trampling, and wallowing behaviors create landscape diversity that supports hundreds of prairie species. Economically, the buffalo program generates revenue through hunting licenses sold to non-tribal members, with fees ranging from $2,000 to $7,500 per license distributed through a raffle system, as well as through the sale of live surplus animals. Culturally, the buffalo renewal allows tribal members to reconnect with traditional practices and spiritual relationships. As Daniel Kinsey, faculty at Aaniiih Nakoda College, observed in a landmark study on tribal buffalo restoration, the buffalo are central to the community, and Fort Belknap's successful program resulted from decades of hard work by dedicated individuals ("Landmark Study Demonstrates Cultural, Ecological and Economic Benefits"). The restoration effort exemplifies the tribes' commitment to healing both their people and their lands—a process that acknowledges historical trauma while actively working toward renewal.

The water rights struggle that began with the Winters decision in 1908 has continued throughout Fort Belknap's history. Despite their legal victory establishing reserved water rights, the tribes have faced persistent challenges in actually accessing and utilizing these rights. The Fort Belknap Indian Irrigation Project, owned by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, diverts water from the Milk River and two tributaries to serve 10,475 assessed acres, of which 92 percent are held in trust for the tribes or allottees. However, the infrastructure requires significant investment and modernization to fulfill the promises of agricultural self-sufficiency that motivated the Winters decision. The complexity of water administration in the Milk River Basin, involving federal agencies, irrigation companies, and state water rights holders, necessitated creation of the Milk River Coordinating Committee to coordinate storage and releases of water among various entities ("Fort Belknap Indian Reservation Compact").

In 2023, the Fort Belknap Indian Community pursued congressional approval of a comprehensive water rights settlement. The proposed Gros Ventre and Assiniboine Tribes Water Rights Settlement Act addresses the tribes' water rights claims across four water court sub-basins and provides federal funding for infrastructure improvements, including rehabilitation of the Milk River Project. The settlement builds upon more than a century of struggle that began with Winters v. United States and seeks to transform legal water rights into actual, usable water resources. In June 2024, the U.S. Senate passed the settlement bill, marking a significant milestone in the tribes' efforts to secure their water future ("Welcome to Fort Belknap Indian Community"). The settlement represents not merely a legal resolution but an acknowledgment of the federal government's trust responsibility and the importance of water to Fort Belknap's continued viability as a homeland.

Contemporary Fort Belknap reflects both the enduring impacts of historical dispossession and the resilience of the Aaniiih and Nakoda peoples. The reservation encompasses approximately 675,147 acres, a small fraction of the vast territories the tribes once occupied. The reservation's land status reflects the fragmentation caused by the allotment system: approximately 162,932 acres are tribally owned, while 427,579 acres remain as allotted lands. Fort Belknap has been described as one of the most fractionated reservations in the country, with an estimated 75 percent of reservation land divided among thousands of descendants of original allottees—a situation that severely complicates land management and economic development ("Fort Belknap Indian Reservation - Wikipedia"). The Land Buy-Back Program for Tribal Nations, established as part of the 2009 Cobell v. Salazar settlement addressing federal mismanagement of Indian trust funds, has worked to consolidate fractionated interests. In June 2015, the Department of the Interior sent approximately 3,500 offers to buy back fractionated land worth more than $54 million, affecting 26,000 tracts within Fort Belknap's boundaries ("Fort Belknap Indian Reservation - Wikipedia").

The reservation's population reflects the challenges of economic opportunity in rural Montana and the continuing cultural ties that bind tribal members to their homeland. Total tribal enrollment stands at approximately 7,000 members, with roughly 3,400 residing on or near the reservation. The main population centers include Fort Belknap Agency on the northern boundary along the Milk River, and Lodge Pole and Hays on the southern portion near the Little Rocky Mountains. Additional communities dot the reservation landscape, including smaller settlements and housing clusters. The adjacent border towns of Harlem and Dodson have majority Indian populations and maintain close connections with the reservation ("Fort Belknap Indian Reservation (Montana) • FamilySearch"). The Bureau of Indian Affairs and tribal government serve as the major employers, with agriculture—consisting of cattle ranches and dry land farms—providing additional economic opportunities. The tribes have also pursued economic development through the Little Rockies Meat Packing Company, Inc., the first tribally owned, USDA-inspected meat packing facility in the United States, and through efforts to develop tourism and marketing opportunities for Native American artisans ("Fort Belknap Indian Community").

Fort Belknap's historical significance in Montana history operates on multiple levels. Most fundamentally, the reservation serves as the homeland for two sovereign tribal nations whose histories extend thousands of years before Euro-American contact and whose presence will continue into the indefinite future. The Aaniiih and Nakoda peoples transformed themselves from wide-ranging nomadic buffalo hunters into a unified political community managing a dramatically reduced territorial base while maintaining distinct cultural identities—an achievement that required extraordinary adaptability and determination.

The reservation's significance extends beyond the specific experiences of its tribal members to encompass broader themes in American Indian law and policy. Fort Belknap gave rise to Winters v. United States, establishing the reserved rights doctrine that protects tribal water access across the western United States. This legal precedent fundamentally shaped water law in arid regions where competition for limited water resources creates ongoing conflicts between tribal, agricultural, municipal, and environmental interests. The Winters Doctrine's principle—that the establishment of a reservation implicitly reserves resources necessary to fulfill the reservation's purposes—has been applied beyond water rights to address other natural resources, demonstrating Fort Belknap's continuing influence on federal Indian law.

The reservation's experience with environmental exploitation illustrates recurring patterns in the relationship between indigenous communities and extractive industries. The coerced sale of the Little Rockies in 1895 under threat of starvation, followed by decades of mining that contaminated tribal water sources, exemplifies how economic development driven by non-Indian interests has consistently been prioritized over tribal wellbeing and treaty rights. The tribes' persistent legal and political resistance to mining expansion, culminating in the eventual cessation of operations, demonstrates the possibilities of indigenous environmental activism even against powerful corporate and political forces.

Fort Belknap's buffalo restoration program and ecological initiatives represent a forward-looking vision that honors traditional relationships with the land while employing contemporary conservation methods. The restoration effort acknowledges that healing from historical trauma requires not only legal victories and economic development but also the renewal of spiritual and cultural connections to non-human relatives and traditional territories. By leading in buffalo restoration and ecological research, Fort Belknap contributes to broader movements for indigenous sovereignty and environmental justice across North America.

The ongoing challenges facing Fort Belknap—land fractionation, limited economic opportunities, water infrastructure needs, and environmental remediation in the Little Rockies—reflect systemic problems affecting Indian Country generally. Yet the tribes' responses to these challenges, including constitutional governance adaptations, educational institution building, buffalo restoration, water rights settlement negotiations, and land consolidation efforts, demonstrate sophisticated political and cultural strategies for survival and renewal.

Fort Belknap Indian Reservation occupies a crucial place in Montana's history because it reveals the true costs of statehood and western expansion: the dispossession of indigenous peoples from vast territories, the imposition of foreign governmental and economic systems, and the environmental degradation of lands and waters that sustained human communities for millennia. Simultaneously, Fort Belknap's history demonstrates that dispossession did not result in disappearance. The Aaniiih and Nakoda peoples adapted to catastrophic changes while maintaining cultural continuity, asserted their rights through legal systems designed to subordinate them, and built institutions and programs that position them to thrive in the twenty-first century. Understanding Fort Belknap's significance requires acknowledging both the injustices that define much of the reservation's history and the remarkable resilience that characterizes the tribal community's response to those injustices. This dual recognition—of trauma and of resistance, of loss and of persistence—provides essential context for understanding not only Montana's past but also its present and future as a place where indigenous and non-indigenous communities continue negotiating their relationships to land, resources, and each other.

Works Cited

"Assiniboine and Gros Ventre Tribes and Fort Belknap Reservation Timeline." AAA Native Arts, 19 Mar. 2013, https://www.aaanativearts.com/assiniboine-grosventre-fort-belknap-timeline. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"Bringing Bison Home | Initiatives | WWF." World Wildlife Fund, https://www.worldwildlife.org/initiatives/bringing-bison-home. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"A company that moved mountains runs into a wall." High Country News, 24 Jan. 2024, https://www.hcn.org/issues/issue-121/a-company-that-moved-mountains-runs-into-a-wall/. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"corporate charter of the fort belknap indian community." University of Oklahoma College of Law, https://thorpe.law.ou.edu/IRA/ftbelchrtr.html. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"Fort Belknap Indian Community." Montana Tribal Nations, https://tribalnations.mt.gov/Directory/FortBelknapIndianCommunity. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"Fort Belknap Indian Community responds to Luke Ployhar's plans for mining at Zortman Landusky." Daily Montanan, 14 Feb. 2022, https://dailymontanan.com/2022/02/14/fort-belknap-indian-community-responds-to-luke-ployhars-plans-for-mining-at-zortman-landusky/. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"Fort Belknap Indian Reservation." Wikipedia, 13 Jan. 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Belknap_Indian_Reservation . Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"Fort Belknap Indian Reservation Compact." Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, https://dnrc.mt.gov/Water-Resources/Compacts/Fort-Belknap-Indian-Community. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"Fort Belknap Indian Reservation (Montana)." FamilySearch, 18 Apr. 2024, https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Fort_Belknap_Indian_Reservation_(Montana). Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"Fort Belknap Reservation Timeline Assiniboine and Gros Ventre Tribes 2017." Montana Office of Public Instruction, https://opi.mt.gov/Portals/182/Page%20Files/Indian%20Education/Social%20Studies/K-12%20Resources/Fort%20Belknap%20Timeline.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"1 Gros Ventre and Assiniboine Tribes of the Fort Belknap Indian." Montana Legislature, https://archive.legmt.gov/content/Committees/Interim/2021-2022/State-Tribal-Relations/meetings/april-2022/FBIC-water-settlement-executive-summary-2021.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"History of Mining and Protection in the Little Rocky Mountains: A Timeline of Events." Red Thunder Oral History Project, https://redthunderoralhistoryproject.org/timeline. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"Home | Red Thunder Oral History Project." Red Thunder Oral History Project, https://redthunderoralhistoryproject.org/home. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"Landmark Study Demonstrates Cultural, Ecological and Economic Benefits of Tribal Bison Restoration." Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, https://nationalzoo.si.edu/news/landmark-study-demonstrates-cultural-ecological-and-economic-benefits-tribal-bison-restoration. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"THE FORT BELKNAP RESERVATION HOME TO THE GROS VENTRE AND ASSINIBOINE." Montana's Missouri River Country, https://missouririvermt.com/article/the-fort-belknap-reservation-home-to-the-gros-ventre-and-assiniboine. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"Tribal Buffalo Conservation Summit." National Wildlife Federation, https://www.nwf.org/Our-Work/Wildlife-Conservation/Bison/Tribal-Lands/Summit. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

United States. Office of Indian Affairs. Map of Fort Belknap Indian Reservation, Montana. 1936. Montana Historical Society Library and Archives, https://www.mtmemory.org/nodes/view/87656. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"Welcome to Fort Belknap Indian Community." Fort Belknap Indian Community, https://ftbelknap.org/. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"Winters v. United States." Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winters_v._United_States. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.

"WINTERS DOCTRINE." Encyclopedia of the Great Plains, https://plainshumanities.unl.edu/encyclopedia/doc/egp.wat.041.html. Accessed 15 Feb. 2026.